Thursday, October 10, 2013

Problems in Hamlet, or, ???

As we all know, Hamlet is full of problems. There are some really big problems that are central to the play, for example: Why does Hamlet delay his revenge? Is the ghost really the ghost of Old Hamlet? Does Hamlet actually go mad, is he just pretending--or a little bit of both?

There are also a lot of little problems, narrative and textual questions that are a result of having multiple editions of Hamlet. For example, does Hamlet talk about his too too SOLID, too too SULLIED or even too too SALLIED flesh?

But the kinds of problems I want to talk about lie somewhere in between: they're not central to the play as a whole, but they're persistently troubling and once you see them, they're impossible to ignore.

 1. Who watches Ophelia drown and why don't they save her?

In 4.7, Gertrude tells Laertes that Ophelia has drowned:
There, on the pendent boughs her coronet weeds
Clambering to hang, an envious sliver broke;
When down her weedy trophies and herself
Fell in the weeping brook. Her clothes spread wide;
And, mermaid-like, awhile they bore her up:
Which time she chanted snatches of old tunes;
As one incapable of her own distress,
Or like a creature native and indued
Unto that element: but long it could not be
Till that her garments, heavy with their drink,
Pull'd the poor wretch from her melodious lay
To muddy death.

This is a very vivid description of a slow, lingering death. In fact, it's so vivid that the image has been painted and used in cinema many times, for example, by John Everett Millais:














And more recently, in Lars von Trier's brilliant film Melancholia:
 













But how does Gertrude know that it happened like this? If she was the person watching Ophelia drown, why didn't she try to save her? If it was someone else, why didn't they? And why don't any of the other characters in the play seem to notice?


 2. How old is Hamlet?

Throughout the play, we're led to believe that Hamlet is a pretty young man. He's a college student and unmarried; Laertes says he's still "in the youth of primy nature." All the clues lead us to believe that he's about twenty. But then in the gravedigger speech, we learn that the gravedigger started his job "the very day that young Hamlet was born" and that he's been doing it for "thirty years." So in this scene, we learn that Hamlet is thirty. Did Shakespeare change his mind? If he was thirty all along, why is he still in college? And why isn't he married?


3. Why are there so many birds in the play?

 Ms. Barrios and I discussed this problem briefly the other day: to begin with, there are a lot of hawks and allusions to hawking, a medieval and Renaissance sport in which one trained hawks to catch smaller birds. Hamlet tells Rosencrantz and Guildenstern that he is "but mad north-north-west: when the wind is southerly I know a hawk from a handsaw." "We'll e'en to't like French falconers," Hamlet tells the players, and Horatio uses the falconer's cry "illo, ho, ho my lord" to which Hamlet replies, "Hillo, ho, ho boy! Come, bird, come." Claudius' comment that Hamlet has returned after being sent to England "checking at his voyage" is also drawn from falconry, as is "pitch" in the phrase "enterprises of great pitch and moment."

It's not just hawks, though. There's a reference to a rooster ("The bird of dawning"), a lapwing ("This lapwing runs away with the shell on his head"), a sparrow ("there's a special providence in the fall of a sparrow"), and a very strange comparison involving a basket of birds and an ape ("Let the birds fly, and, like the famous ape, / To try conclusions, in the basket creep, / And break your own neck down"). Does this leitmotif reveal something about the kind of world these characters inhabit? If so, what?

Please feel free to post more problems, questions, ideas or even solutions in the comments below!

8 comments:

  1. Response to question number 3 "Why are there so many birds in the play?"

    If you ask someone which animal he/she associates with freedom, most likely the response will be a bird. Birds are known for representing freedom at its purest. I think the birds in Hamlet symbolize the freedom that Hamlet wants to attain in regards to his own self. He wants to free himself of his life, his thoughts, and his emotions, through suicide. However, when a bird dies it is almost as if its freedom is being taken away because it is no longer "free" to execute its will. For Hamlet, freedom comes through death, but for a bird life is their freedom, and their death is like Hamlet's hell.

    ***opposing relationship
    Hamlet wants freedom through death
    Birds have freedom through life

    what could this relationship represent?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great interpretation, Karen! I think that's very helpful.

    Let me just see if we can take this one step further: if birds typically represent the freedom for which Hamlet longs, it seems especially significant that so many of his birds aren't imagined in full flight, but on the ground or in captivity. The fall, not flight, of a sparrow. The hawks, which are trained to return to their owners and to earth. And so on. What do all of you think?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I believe that these birds are portrayed flightless for a definite purpose and that is one already mentioned of captivity. Their wings aren't clipped for one to say they don't have the capability to fly, in fact to me they are free, but what doesn't allow them to fulfill these freedoms or to even fly is their own conscience, their own will. Their has to be something greater than them to keep them on earth or coming back. We can see this one of two ways. One that these birds really have no clue that they roam around freedom everyday and don't partake in it because they feel the must to always return. Or two they are aware of these freedoms but don't necessarily care because they have a motive, an incentive for them to come back.These birds need to be content as to where they are. Perhaps not the best of conditions but enough for them to return. That is where Hamlet has trouble distinguishing himself. Because he even says it in his "To be or not to be" soliloquy, to go for it or not. He uses these birds to reach atmospheres that he will never and symbolizes himself in these birds because he knows their abilities but envisions them flightless because these birds represent him and if he is unable to reach these altitudes neither will these free and flight-full birds.

      Delete
  3. Because birds in captivity or on the ground represent **trapped freedom, I believe they prevail in Hamlet.
    Hamlet is a character who desires freedom, but like a bird in captivity, cannot achieve so.

    Hawks are predator birds with great eye sight. They are also known as some of the most intelligent bird species.
    Falconry/Hawking: the art of keeping falcons/hawks and training them to return from flight to a lure or to hunt quarry

    Hawks can learn to obey their masters, but can also be predators on their own(w/o master)
    Freedom is allowed to a certain point(under Masters regulations)
    Could this Hawk represent Hamlet? And if yes, how so?
    Master=Claudius maybe? or Hamlets own conscious?

    ReplyDelete
  4. So my thought is hawking brings together the predatory and vulnerable aspects of Hamlet's predicament: he plots revenge yet is conditioned to do so by forces that seem to conspire, "inform" against him. Also...does "osric" sound faintly birdlike? Is it because it sounds like "osprey"? :)
    I've also wondered about the sullied, sallied, solid debate, and I wonder if somehow the word is chosen precisely because of the slippage? It makes me wonder about homonyms and how "sound" lends semic traits between words---that even if we know they mean different things, the ear may process meaning faster than the brain and somehow elide the meanings?

    ReplyDelete
  5. And.. today during rehearsal I heard another bird reference from Laertes:
    "Why, as a woodcock to mine own springe, Osric. I am justly killed with mine own treachery. "

    ReplyDelete
  6. In response to question #2

    Hamlet's a character that we learn about through other characters and their interactions. We really don't see his life before the death of his father. Perhaps Hamlet is composed of various ages and that is why we cant really put together his reasoning because it's at different developmental stages of a person. Why is it that he's so attached to his father? That he wishes to avenge his death. But even with that he fears it. So within Hamlet's character we see the break down of his mind set. Mature then not so mature. We see and adolescent side of parental attachment then a stage of matureness to avenge the death.Lets take into consideration the pivotal moment that Hamlet has to shift into this vengeful mindset. He doesn't start these thought until his fathers apparition. If we take it another step back and ask ourselves, If hes a knowledgeable middle aged man why would he believe these visions? No one is able to validate them but his other scholarly friend, Horatio and two gravediggers. How much credibility can be placed on college degrees if these two scholars fall for something they should have the knowledge to know better about. When I say credible college degrees I ask you all if it matters or not to have a college education because Horatio, Hamlet, and the two gravediggers(whom don't posses much knowledge) saw the ghost of Hamlet.
    *** Now Ms. Barrios, Professor Werlin I do aspire to go to college so no point intended just asking. (:
    Because I Googled William Shakespeare's education and "Shakespeare didn't go to college. He was pulled out of New King's School because his dad had financial problems, and he didn't continue his education." -wiki.answers.com

    Therefore for me the questions that rise are:
    1. If hes a knowledgeable middle aged man why would he believe these visions?

    2. How much value can be placed on college education, based on the text?

    3. Is Hamlet composed of various ages? Why or Why not?

    4. Was Shakespeare trying to tell us something by presenting hamlets ghost to these four characters opposed to a single group of people?

    ReplyDelete